A fish called Wanda

in Community

A smear campaign involving a fictional character named Wanda Muscle and allegations of trophy hunting are the latest additions to the theatrical dysfunction plaguing the San Mateo County Harbor District Board of Commissioners.

Add into the mix a highlight reel of outbursts at meetings starring its most disruptive member, Commissioner Sabrina Brennan, continued infighting over sexual harassment allegations filed by Brennan in 2017 and renewed discussion about a nearly decade-old “sign-gate” controversy, and what can be stated with certainty is an election is coming up.

The five-member Harbor District Board, which supports operations of Pillar Point Harbor in Princeton and the Oyster Point Marina/Park in South San Francisco, has for decades been criticized for dysfunction, with multiple Grand Jury investigations calling for its dissolution over crippling battles among elected commissioners.

The Board’s dysfunction reached perhaps a crescendo at a Zoom meeting on April 15, during which Commissioner Brennan launched into a lengthy and highly-publicized tirade against fellow Commissioner Tom Mattusch after he voted differently from her on an agenda item. During the outburst, she used colorful language to re-draw attention to a three-year-old sexual harassment charge she filed against Mattusch.

Less than a month after the April 15 meeting, San Mateo County Supervisor Don Horsley renewed the oft-suggested prospect of dissolving the Harbor District Board, remarking during his assessment that one commissioner is “repeatedly creating commotions and disruptions that are not beneficial.” In May, the County supes voted unanimously to request an updated municipal service review of the district, and to offer to share in the cost of hiring a consultant who could instill decorum at Board meetings.

But with an election looming, sparks were only beginning to fly.

On the Nov. 3 ballot, Lemoine “Lee” Fernandez is running to unseat Mattusch for District 4. Fernandez happens to be Brennan’s mother. Adding to the drama: former Menlo Park Mayor Kirsten Keith is running against incumbent Virginia Chang Kiraly, also a Brennan nemesis, for District 5. Keith and Kiraly have history. Controversy in 2011 over whether John Woodell, Keith’s husband, removed one of Kiraly’s campaign signs resulted in a number of lawsuits. Woodell’s lawsuits were tossed in 2014 by a judge who “labeled the controversy as ‘sign-gate’ in one of her rulings,” the Daily Post reported.

The upcoming Harbor District election already has its fair share of campaign shenanigans.

‘Wanda Muscle’

Recently, emails from a “Wanda Muscle” went out to residents that aimed to defame Mattusch. Similar emails have attacked Kiraly. “Wanda Muscle” was also linked to a recent Change.org petition accusing Mattusch of being a big game trophy hunter. A Facebook account dating back to 2018 alleges,  “What Will Tom Kill Next.” Mattusch strongly denies the claims made against him, saying he participates in ethical hunting that helps to raise funds for wildlife conservation.

Mattusch, as well as Nancy Reyering, another colleague on the commission, believe the smear campaign is the work of Brennan and John Ullom, a citizen and self-admitted disrupter at the Harbor District and other local agencies.

Brennan strongly denies involvement in the smear campaign, while Ullom takes sole responsibility.

‘Only regret I have is Wanda’

“The only regret I have is Wanda,” Ullom told Climate.

Ullom says Brennan has not been assisting him in his personal campaign to paint Mattusch and Kiraly in a negative light.

“I also am the one who is making the videos that expose them for what they are,” he said.

Ullom’s antics have made headlines in the recent past. In 2017, Half Moon Bay city officials reached a $50,000 settlement with a former city clerk who alleged the city failed to protect her from alleged harassment by Ullom.

Ullom is not shy about stirring the pot and insists he can back up his claims. But he has abandoned hiding behind the Wanda Muscle identification. “It did not feel right so I outed myself…,” he said.

“As far as Brennan goes, we find each other useful sometimes but right now she is pissing me off,” he said.

Brennan told Climate she has “nothing to do with anything John Ollum is doing related to this campaign.”

“He’s impossible to keep up with,” she said. “I don’t know what that guy is up to, I have nothing to do with it.”

A Facebook page established to defame Tom Mattusch.

‘Well-coordinated smear’

No matter who is behind the smears, they have become topics of community discussion on social media.

Mattush told Climate it amounts to a “well-coordinated smear campaign.”

Mattusch said he grew up a non-hunter and, after trying target shooting, wanted to try harvesting his own food, “because wild game has no chemicals or hormones found in store-bought food.” He endorses the Pittman–Robertson Act that taxes hunters in order to fund wildlife conservation.

“Whether hunting in the U.S. or around the world, hunting pays for conservation and saves species,” Mattusch said.

Mattusch also calls Brennan’s sexual harassment claims a “false” attempt “to extort taxpayer dollars.”

In 2017, Brennan accused Mattusch of sexual harassment stemming from allegations that in part included a 2014 email he sent to her and reportedly 41 other people that included pornographic images. At the time, Brennan was assisting Mattusch in his campaign for commissioner. Mattusch claimed the email was a misguided attempt at a joke.

An investigation commissioned by the Harbor District found Brennan’s sexual harassment allegations “more likely than not unfounded.” While the email Mattusch sent contained images that can easily be deemed offensive and inappropriate, an independent investigator noted they were sent before he was elected commissioner. The investigator added that Brennan “was not so offended” at the time that she stopped supporting Mattusch’s campaign. “…But rather, she continued to campaign for him when he was on his safari trip that lasted several weeks,” the investigator’s report states.

Peace eludes

Mattusch called Brennan’s continued accusations “bold and very hurtful towards me.”

“I’m not the first person that this Commissioner has tried to destroy,” he said.

Mattusch referenced a 2018 Daily Post report pegging the cost the allegations have had on the Harbor District.

“This case brings the total amount that the district has spent in settlements and legal fees involving Brennan to $780,099,” the Daily Post stated at the time. “The figure includes investigations into complaints Brennan has filed and investigations into complaints about her, as well as settlements to employees.”

Mattusch said Brennan’s antics overshadow the important work done by the Harbor District Board.

“It is a shame that a single bad actor, a single commissioner, can cause so much havoc, expense, and ill will,” he said.

Ullom defends Brennan as a fearless, sorely-needed reformer of the Harbor District who helped get rid of the “old boys” of the district’s past.

However, he adds, “Sabrina is a very good war-time general, but does not know how to win the peace.”

Photos of current San Mateo County Harbor District commissioners, from top left to top right: Sabrina Brennan and Tom Mattusch, and from bottom left to bottom right: Nancy Reyering, Virginia Chang Kiraly and Edmundo Larenas

5 Comments

  1. And, there’s even so much more. However it should not be seen as one bad actor: Ed Larenas acts the same as Brennan. Also it should not tarnish the 3 vote majority that consistently gets things done. The two person minority could be grown up and professional and act like adults, but they appear unable to. See the Opinion by Larenas in the Half Moon Bay Review (currently active), in which he misrepresents the lack of “public input” of committees and apparently also his educational background. He refuses to join closed sessions in which votes are to be taken (when he is present at the meeting). He swipes at members of the public and plays hostage and grandstanding with the budget because he refuses to see that Oyster Point is also in the budget. His “greatest hits” YouTube collection is nearly as bad as Brennan’s. Wanda Muscle did not out himself.

  2. Staff wrote:

    “No matter who is behind the smears, they have become topics of community discussion on social media.”

    John Ullom sparked the community discussion. But I smeared nobody. This is what Mattusch does for fun, in his own words:

    “We were finding a good blood trail with bits of bone occasionally. The buffalo made it about two miles before we found it and had our way with it.” — Tom Mattusch

    Imagine running two miles while shedding bits of bone. Imagine Mattusch having his way.

    Maybe Staff considers what Tom wrote about himself to be defamation. You decide:– https://huntforever.org/2013/03/06/mozambique-adventure-with-safrique/

    The video that Staff chose to show you ain’t pretty. Some of it can’t be defended. But Staff only wants you to see the video that depicts one side of the story.

    Here is a video of Tom Mattusch claiming that Brennan asked him to send her the explicit pornography he enjoys distributing. Read the report Staff linked in the hit piece about the harassment. Note the Mattusch never claimed Brennan “wanted it” until a few weeks ago:– https://youtu.be/ivCMs3BqG_0

    Pretty ugly stuff and quite defamatory. Staff didn’t want you to see that. And Staff figured this video of Virginia Chang Kiraly pitching a royal fit would be useful for you to know. Here are the highlights: — https://youtu.be/K6qcvwxgTxo

    I spoke with Mike Aldax. He for some reason chose to tell you only half of what I said and nothing I said about Kiraly, Reyering, or Mattusch. There is of course a lot more. But Staff…well…Staff and Mr. Aldeax had a story to tell and they told the part that proved it. Your call as to whether you were told the truth.

    I am John Ullom and I own these words.

    Bonus links: — https://www.scribd.com/document/479817688/Kiraly-and-Mattusch-Sell-Out-Taxpayers

    https://www.scribd.com/document/479957885/Reyering-Brown-Act-Violations-Investigation

    https://youtu.be/FPgdQwoiwaY

  3. Kirsten Keith will be a good addition to this board. She has a great reputation for working collaboratively on boards and commissions. Keith even endorsed all four candidates that were elected to the Harbor District back in 2016.

    “𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗡𝗔𝗡, 𝗞𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗟𝗬, 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗨𝗦𝗖𝗛 and 𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗔𝗦 for 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘆 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻. The incumbents can take credit for turning the district around, which is now debt free for the first time in 40 years, and Ed Larenas has scientific and environmental experience that will benefit the commission. The Half Moon Bay Review and San Mateo Daily Journal both got it right by supporting the incumbents and Ed Larenas.”

    https://www.facebook.com/Kirsten.Keith.Esq/posts/10154062224558657

  4. Just noticed that the video “Staff” linked was posted on a fake youtube account. No way to know who created it or posted it. But “Staff” chose to share it anyway.

    You just can’t make this stuff up!

  5. “In short, the San Mateo County Harbor District is governed by people more interested in fighting among themselves than managing millions in taxpayer funding and a couple of the true jewels of San Mateo County… The only rational approach for voters is to vote out the incumbents. This year, voters on the coast will have two opportunities to do so.”

    Editorial board — Half Moon Bay Review
    https://www.hmbreview.com/opinion/voting-for-korth-is-best-hope-for-dysfunctional-harbor-commission/article_8fbc2c3e-13cb-11eb-beec-835d1973cd12.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*