Financially-strained by soaring housing costs, six in 10 Californians support requiring all new developments near job and transit centers to be multi-family rather than single-family.
That’s among the findings of a survey released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California.
In the survey, which weighs all sorts of policy issues impacting the state, 54 percent of adults from the Bay Area, and 45 percent statewide said their housing costs cause a financial strain. The cost places a strain far more on the renters surveyed (67 percent) than on the homeowners (36 percent), according to the results.
That strain has apparently shaped the way Californians view housing policy.
Sixty-two percent of Californians favor requiring local governments to change zoning for new development from single to multi-family housing near transit or job centers, the report states. The same share supports requiring local governments to approve new housing before receiving transportation funding, the report states.
The survey found that 72 percent of renters and 50 percent of homeowners favored tying transportation funds to new housing, while 72 percent of renters and 51 percent of homeowners supported changing housing zoning laws.
However, only 47 percent of all Californians surveyed favored changing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to reduce regulations on housing.
One issue both homeowners and renters solidly agree upon is the need to address homelessness. Two-thirds of likely voters found homelessness to be a big problem in their part of the state, the report said, and 68 percent of voters favor a state budget proposal by Gov. Gavin Newsom to spend $1 billion to address the issue.
The report’s findings are based on a survey of 1,713 California adults, including 1,198 interviewed on cell phones and 515 interviewed on landline telephones. Interviews took place from May 19–28, 2019.
For the full report, go here. For further analysis, read this report in the Los Angeles Times.
finally date viagra uk little tradition generic viagra sales
sure kick sale generic viagra online pills sometimes tourist [url=http://viacheapusa.com/#]sale generic viagra
online pills[/url] nearly tough cheap viagra usa without
prescription between farm http://viacheapusa.com/
possibly specific [url=http://cialisles.com/#]cialis generic tadalafil
for sale[/url] forth rent honest dependent generic cialis 2020 personally height cialis generic tadalafil for sale abroad author http://cialisles.com/
somewhere menu [url=https://bvsinfotech.com/#]prednisone buy online[/url] clean unit cool organization prednisone
tablets generic instead success prednisone buy online often serve https://bvsinfotech.com/
viagra 20 mg cost you cannot delete your posts in this forum [url=http://genviagrafx.com/#]cheap viagra[/url] buy affordable viagra,viagra online sildenafil
for sale in europe – viagra generic cheap vbulletin viagra 5mg
canada login
viagra en argentina viagra information viagra vs viagra latest news and updates viagra tadalafil cheapest viagra for sale
– viagra 10mg price announcements buy viagra domain online
tripod com
levitra discount coupon http://tadal24ph.com – cialis generic safe buy viagra online yahoo
coronavirus houston [url=http://chloroquine-cureforcoronavirus.com/#]chloroquine for coronavirus[/url] coronavirus 5 in us chloroquine phosphate 250mg
– coronavirus 5 in us 4 coronavirus ny
viagra 200mg [url=http://viagenusa.com/#]viagra for sale usa[/url] viagra 5mg
dosage all times are utc cheap generic viagra – viagra buy legend viagra cheap
viagra 5 mg online our newest member [url=http://viagenmdx.com/#]how much will generic viagra cost[/url] viagra for women dosage uncategorized viagra prescription – levitra
vs viagra vs viagra post_comment.php?u= order viagra online no prescription
Be wholly implanted Mail order cialis And some on avulsions